Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- From: Jim Davis <jimdavis2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Sep 2005 00:57:58 GMT
Paul F. Dietz wrote:
> No, but then they weren't comparing a two-stage shuttle to
> a stage-and-a-half shuttle.
>
> Why did you bring up this irrelevancy anyway?
I was trying (unsuccessfully it appears) to decouple the reusability
from the staging technique. Is Magnus claiming greater margins acrue
from adopting tandem staging over parallel staging or is he claiming
greater margins because of full vs. partial reusability?
Jim Davis
.
- References:
- Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- From: Magnus Redin
- Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- Prev by Date: Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- Next by Date: Re: Pentagon may transfer FIA from Boeing to Lockmart
- Previous by thread: Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- Next by thread: Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- Index(es):