Re: Why CEV?
- From: Anthony Frost <Vulch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:06:24 +0100
In message <InMCqt.DtG@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry Spencer) wrote:
> In article <zLCdnYRN8_s1BKHeRVn-og@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> livecam <livecam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >...Why not join Russia and Europe in
> >developing and manufacturing Kliper which could become a defacto world
> >standard piloted space vehicle?
>
> Because the Russian workers who will build Kliper do not vote in US
> elections, so sending US tax money to them is politically most
> unappealing. (The Europeans have the same problem with it, by the way.)
Though by the time Kliper is ready to fly there's a reasonable chance
that the Russian workers building it will at least be voting on whether
to vote in European elections. For the usual variations of Europe.
Anthony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why CEV?
- From: Sander Vesik
- Re: Why CEV?
- References:
- Re: Why CEV?
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Why CEV?
- Prev by Date: Re: Lunar Architecture Poll Results
- Next by Date: Re: Curiosity Question about EELV Development Funding
- Previous by thread: Re: Why CEV?
- Next by thread: Re: Why CEV?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|