Re: Arguments for keeping shuttle around longer
- From: "Ed Kyle" <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Oct 2005 08:20:14 -0700
Henry Spencer wrote:
> In article <1128283201.805567.264160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ed
> Kyle <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >The remaining orbiters are not "worn out". They have flown only a
> >fraction of their design airframe lifetimes...
>
> Careful here -- how the design lifetime relates to the actual lifetime is
> most uncertain.
Perhaps, but with Discovery we do have a kind of
precursor airframe test vehicle. Discovery has
flown 31 times and has not shown any career-ending
airframe fatigue problems. Atlantis has flown
26 times. Endeavour has flown 19. If canary
Discovery starts showing airframe fatigue, it is
very likely that enough life will still remain
in the two other orbiters to complete four or five
years worth of missions.
- Ed Kyle
.
- References:
- Re: Arguments for keeping shuttle around longer
- From: John Savard
- Re: Arguments for keeping shuttle around longer
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Arguments for keeping shuttle around longer
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Arguments for keeping shuttle around longer
- Prev by Date: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- Next by Date: Re: Why go back to the moon?
- Previous by thread: Re: Arguments for keeping shuttle around longer
- Next by thread: Re: Arguments for keeping shuttle around longer
- Index(es):
Loading