Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: "Allen Thomson" <thomsona@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Oct 2005 19:56:22 -0700
Gene Cash wrote:
> > That is a subset of a larger question: What are the astronauts
> > supposed to do on the moon? One-week expeditions can do
> > Apollo-style geology(*). After that, "what else" starts to
> > come up.
> Hm, I don't think so... do you seriously think that if you put a
> geologist[*] on the Moon, a week later he's going to dust his hands and
> say "ok, all done. let's go home." ? :)
Perhaps it would informative to ask a geologist about that. But be
careful, just to repeat the point, not to fall into the mode of
justifying the missions on the basis of geology or other science
until the day comes when the science can bear that burden. Doing
science as a framework for accomplishing the primary goal of
developing and proving space-faring technologies would be fine;
doing it for its own sake wouldn't be fine for that oft-repeated
foreseeable future.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: dasun
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- References:
- Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Allen Thomson
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Allen Thomson
- Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- Prev by Date: Re: commercial uses of the Stick and the Heavy Lifter
- Next by Date: Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- Previous by thread: Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- Next by thread: Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|