Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: "Allen Thomson" <thomsona@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Oct 2005 08:47:00 -0700
Alex Terrell wrote:
> As a trained geologist, would you prefer:
> a: Six visits to different lunar locations, each visit lasting a week,
> with a crew of 4, with some geology experiments, and returning with
> 100kg of rocks.
> b: A permanently manned base, with a crew of 8, in a single location,
> with ability to study rocks, and lunar rovers able to take you for a
> radius of 100km.
It will be interesting to see who NASA picks for the RTTM crews.
Presumably trained geologists on the spot would be better at
doing geology than general-purpose astronauts teleconsulting with
geologists back on earth.
.
- References:
- Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Allen Thomson
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Allen Thomson
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Allen Thomson
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: dasun
- Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- From: Alex Terrell
- Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- Prev by Date: Re: Shuttle vs Kliper
- Next by Date: Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- Previous by thread: Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- Next by thread: Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|