Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: "Jake McGuire" <jamcguir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Oct 2005 16:58:51 -0700
Ed Kyle wrote:
> If it were a critically important payload, it
> would almost certainly be flying on a proven
> EELV-Medium.
What if it was an important payload, as opposed to a critically
important payload? Like the kind of stuff that's flown on Taurus?
> It seems to me more likely that
> this is an effort by someone in the recon
> research arena to create a more responsive
> EELV alternative.
If they're doing this by buying launches, that's not a subsidy by most
definitions of the word.
-jake
.
- References:
- commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Herm
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Josh Hopkins
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Ed Kyle
- commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- Prev by Date: Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- Next by Date: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Previous by thread: Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- Next by thread: Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|