Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry Spencer)
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:19:52 GMT
In article <evi8k11p0h5r6jnqmglvgpelfpndqc480i@xxxxxxx>,
Josh Hill <joshuaphill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>...But if we can't or
>won't get the Russians, Chinese, and Europeans to compete on equal
>grounds, I say we compete on their grounds and outdo them.
An interesting suggestion.
First, of course, you have to raise employee benefits and job security for
the manufacturing and launch crews to those found in Europe. The lower
standards of the US give it a shocking unfair advantage. :-) This won't
be popular with the companies, mind you.
Then you have to lower safety standards to those of the Chinese. This
may not be popular in some quarters.
Then invest in factory automation and streamlined launch procedures to
match the Russians. This is going to really annoy all the people who get
fired as a result, but it will indeed reduce costs a whole bunch.
(Resolving the conflict between this and item #1 is left as an exercise
for the reader.)
There are reasons other than subsidies why launch prices differ...
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Josh Hill
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- References:
- commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Herm
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Josh Hill
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- From: Josh Hill
- commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- Prev by Date: Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- Next by Date: Re: Stick/CEV Propulsion News
- Previous by thread: Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- Next by thread: Re: commercial uses of the Dtick and the Heavy Lifter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|