Re: The BBC report on Chinese orbital "slip".
- From: jsavard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (John Savard)
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:34:25 GMT
On 14 Oct 2005 10:41:43 -0700, "Allen Thomson" <thomsona@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote, in part:
>neil.fraser@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> For those who missed it, the story used to include gems such as:
>> "Shenzhou VI, which has two astronauts on board, is in a low enough
>> orbit to be affected by the Earth's gravitational pull."
>But, but, but -- it's true! Literally, completely, incontestably
>true, every last word. :-)
As your smiley indicates, even if true, it is misleading; it implies
that it would not be affected by the Earth's gravitational pull if in a
slightly higher orbit.
To be in orbit, of course, means that the Earth's gravitational pull is
there, preventing you from going in a straight line - and, of course, it
also means one is in free fall.
But if they were to say it was in a low enough orbit to be affected by
the resistance of the atmosphere, that would have a chance to be
meaningful and not misleading. And some acceleration would be
experienced within the craft!
John Savard
http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html
http://www.quadibloc.com/index.html
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The BBC report on Chinese orbital "slip".
- From: jonathan
- Re: The BBC report on Chinese orbital "slip".
- References:
- Re: The BBC report on Chinese orbital "slip".
- From: neil.fraser@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The BBC report on Chinese orbital "slip".
- From: Allen Thomson
- Re: The BBC report on Chinese orbital "slip".
- Prev by Date: Re: Nuclear powered airliners
- Next by Date: Re: The BBC report on Chinese orbital "slip".
- Previous by thread: Re: The BBC report on Chinese orbital "slip".
- Next by thread: Re: The BBC report on Chinese orbital "slip".
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|