Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:08:33 GMT
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 02:57:44 GMT, in a place far, far away, Alan
Anderson <aranders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:
>Not to mention the fact that they were ostensibly financing an
>expedition to verify a faster/safer/cheaper route to India, not to find
>the New World. So this is actually an argument *for* Paul's reasoning
>("It may be that the best way to get to space in the long term is to
>ignore it in the short term, and instead make the terrestrial economy
>even bigger and more capable.") rather than against it.
I realized several years ago that I should have been putting my space
enthusiast energy into getting rich, rather than focusing directly on
space. I'd be in a much better position now to do something about
space now if I had.
.
- References:
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Josh Hill
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Josh Hill
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Monte Davis
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Monte Davis
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Alan Anderson
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Prev by Date: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Next by Date: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Previous by thread: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Next by thread: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Index(es):