Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?




Douglas Holmes wrote:
> "Ed Kyle" <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1129474230.083122.321710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > According to information presented by Keith Cowing at
> >
> > "http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1069";
> >
> > the earth orbit CEV that will go to ISS might weigh in
> > at only 15.6 tonnes, yet NASA is developing a crew
> > launch vehicle for CEV that will be capable of boosting
> > nearly 23 tonnes to the ISS inclination. The new crew
> > launcher will have a gross liftoff mass (GLOW) of
> > about 800 tonnes - more than any other expendable launch
> > vehicle except Titan IV. If it were scaled down to a
> > size appropriate for the 15.6 tonne ISS CEV payload, the
> > launcher might have a GLOW less than 550 tonnes - less
> > than Proton and Delta IV Heavy and about the same as
> > Zenit and Atlas V 552.
> >
> Well I am not sure how much of it to count since it probably
> does not go all the way to orbit but you did not add in the
> 4,218 kg mass of the LAS.
> Even with full mass credit it is less then 20 tons.

LAS is jettisonned relatively early, so it is not
counted as orbital payload. The LAS mass is similar
to the mass of a payload shroud in that it is
jettisonned early enough that it does not much
impact the delta-v performance of the second stage.

>
> On the other side Boeing/Northrop is hinting their proposal
> will be much lighter. Only 10-15% more then Apollo. See
> http://space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_051017.html
> That would cut mass to only about 18 tons for a moon mission
> and 13-14 for an ISS mission.
>
> Put simply all of this again leads me to the conclusion that there is
> no need for the stick.
> Of course NASA could disqualify them for being to light for the Stick

The Stick could still do the job, but with a substantially
smaller and lighter (and presumably less-costly) second
stage.

- Ed Kyle

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
    ... >> launch vehicle for CEV that will be capable of boosting ... >> nearly 23 tonnes to the ISS inclination. ... > 4,218 kg mass of the LAS. ... > Even with full mass credit it is less then 20 tons. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
    ... > launch vehicle for CEV that will be capable of boosting ... > nearly 23 tonnes to the ISS inclination. ... 4,218 kg mass of the LAS. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: CEV in disarray???? From space news........
    ... >Right now we can't fly the Lunar CEV SM and CM on one CLV rocket so the new ... With storable propellants, mass increases to 24.7 t, still within the capability of a Delta IVH. ... As pointed out in http://www.astronautix.com/craft/cev.htm for every kg you move from the capsule to an orbital module, you reduce overall vehicle mass by 2 kg. ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: Shuttle going bye-bye?
    ... >>Combined with the desire to speed up work on the CEV, ... I'd say that the Shuttle is standing on mighty ... NASA is probably going to be asked ... So if they can still do crew changes, the ISS build can ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Oberg: "The real significance of the ISS thruster test failure"
    ... the mass of the station is irrelevant to whether a given reboost ... energy to move the ISS from one orbital altitude to another is unrelated ... to the total mass of the ISS to be moved? ... Gib mir die Zahlen die Du hast, ...
    (sci.space.history)