Re: Iran's first satellite
- From: "Jim Oberg" <jameseoberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:58:04 GMT
Sander, that is a perceptive observation. Perhaps the satellite
alone is less provocative (see the reaction to NorKorea's
rocket and 'satellite'). BTW, I think there are two separate
Iranian satellites -- one a store-dump commsat for pipeline
status monitoring, the other a surface imager.
"Sander Vesik" <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1130208325.251369@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Its interesting to note that launching the satellite and
> having its communication and Earth Observation capabilities
> be available seems to have taken a higher priority over
> demonstrating native launch capability. Which leaves the
> other parts of the puzzle - how far along are they and
> how did the Bam earth quake affect it are in shadows. But
> maybe this is less of a priority for Iran now with the
> creation of APSCO and ever-increasing ties with Ukraine,
> India and China?
>
> --
> Sander
>
> +++ Out of cheese error +++
.
- References:
- Iran's first satellite
- From: Sander Vesik
- Iran's first satellite
- Prev by Date: Re: Lunar Lander in a 5.2m faring?
- Next by Date: Re: Lunar Lander in a 5.2m faring?
- Previous by thread: Iran's first satellite
- Next by thread: XCOR engines
- Index(es):