Re: XCOR engines
- From: "Pete Lynn" <pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:57:00 GMT
"Rüdiger Klaehn" <rudi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> Just ask them.
> They are a commercial company, and you are a
> potential customer. So I am sure they will be more
> willing to provide you personally with specs such as
> ISP and T/W than to reply on the news group.
> Maybe they will fax you a NDA or something.
I do not see myself being a potential customer anytime soon. Such
performance information is intentionally absent from their website. This
seems sensible as it is so dependant on variable details. I expect their
policy here is as per their policy on revealing details of Xerus.
I was only wondering if someone could suggest whether their engines are
in the low, medium or high performance ranges with regard to T/W and
> I really hope that the current boom in suborbital space
> flight will lead to more specialization. Why does every
> single rocket technology startup have to build their
> own engines? In the case of armadillo aerospace I
> can see why they do it: it is a lot of fun.
Big launch vehicles saw the development of big engines. There are
currently no good high performance small engines available, with the
possible exception of Xcor? As a consequence people unfortunately still
have to develop their own. As you say, hopefully this will soon change
with increased specialization.
> But in other cases I think it does not make any sense.
> Unfortunately "not invented here" is not only an issue
> at NASA centers.