Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Monte Davis <monte.davis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:46:28 GMT
"Len" <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Rather, this comment was meant to be an exercise
>in logic.
Market elasticity is not a matter of logic, but of empirical fact. And
all the facts since 1957 support the view that the elasticity for
orbital launch services is very far below 1. That's quite typical for
extremely expensive goods and services: seen any price wars for
stealth bombers or TeV particle accelerators lately?
Doubtless there *is* some price range in which the elasticity would be
1 -- i.e. halving the price would double the traffic -- but there's no
evidence we're anywhere near it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Len
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- References:
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Dr John Stockton
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Pete Lynn
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Pete Lynn
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Len
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Len
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Monte Davis
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Len
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Prev by Date: Re: Non Newtonian Propulsion
- Next by Date: Re: XCOR engines
- Previous by thread: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Next by thread: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Index(es):