Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:34:40 -0500
Jeff Findley wrote:
I meant nozzle instead of thrust chamber. You can blow both ends off the
solid at the same time, so that the resulting release of pressure from each
end (roughly) cancels out to zero thrust.
If you vent the upper end sideways (they were going to do this on the MOL/Dyna-Soar Titan III SRBs using two nozzles 180 degrees apart) the sudden pressure drop in the SRB causes combustion to cease.
.
- References:
- Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Ray
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Ray
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Jeff Findley
- Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- Prev by Date: Re: Lame CEV windows
- Next by Date: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- Index(es):