Re: Lame CEV windows
- From: "Alex Terrell" <alexterrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Oct 2005 08:40:52 -0700
Henry Spencer wrote:
> In article <1130449970.293064.81190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> <hasss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Looked it up, Melting point is far too low at around 250 celcius.
> >probably a pretty big no go for reentry. There has got to be somthing
> >better then glass though. Does the shuttle use glass?
>
> Yep. An inner pane of aluminosilicate glass (strong but limited heat
> resistance) as the primary pressure window, a middle pane of fused silica
> (not quite as strong but thermally quite remarkable) as combination backup
> pressure seal and secondary thermal protection, and a fused-silica outer
> pane as primary thermal protection.
>
Could probably use polycarbonate as the inner pane. Lighter, stronger,
cheaper. But it's easily scratched.
> To get better then glass, I think you have to go to exotic things like
> synthetic sapphire, which generally aren't available in big slabs with
> high optical quality. (Some of the orbiter windows are, or were, the
> biggest optical-grade fused-silica windows ever made.)
A few years ago there was a report on metal glass. By forming the metal
around nano particles, which are then dissolved away, a honey-comb
structure is made. With small enough holes (sub wavelength) the
material is transparant.
But it would much, much easier to use retractable cameras.
.
- References:
- Lame CEV windows
- From: hasss
- Re: Lame CEV windows
- From: hasss
- Re: Lame CEV windows
- From: cs_posting
- Re: Lame CEV windows
- From: Henry Spencer
- Lame CEV windows
- Prev by Date: Re: Anyone ever read this Einstein book?
- Next by Date: Re: Lunar Lander in a 5.2m faring?
- Previous by thread: Re: Lame CEV windows
- Next by thread: Re: Lame CEV windows
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|