Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: "Alex Terrell" <alexterrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2005 01:43:54 -0700
> >
> >True, but the process is still extremely violent. That's why I originally
> >said that large SRB's don't so much have a thrust termination system, as a
> >destruct system.
>
> Except that's an ignorant mixing of apples and oranges. While the
> termination is violent (vibration wise) that does not equate to
> destruction of the vehicle.
>
> >Such a system on the shuttle SRB's would have destroyed the orbiter, making
> >that approach pointless.
>
> Whereas such a system on the Stick, won't. (Nor would it have on a
> Gemini-Titan.) You are incorrectly extrapolating from a single
> specific case to a general case.
>
Though if the CEV were still attached the side shock might kill the
crew.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- References:
- Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Ray
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Ray
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- From: Derek Lyons
- Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- Next by Date: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Crew Launch Vehicle Too Big?
- Index(es):