Re: What else could you do with the Stick?
lifeform1@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Schtick : Does not exist, will take 10 billion dollars to develop.
NASA says it will cost $4.5 billion to develop the SRB/SSME Stick
launch vehicle. The other $5.5 billion you are thinking about is the
cost to develop the CEV payload - a cost that will be paid
irregardless of the launcher.
- Ed Kyle
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: vehicles
... Admittedly thety could use something else down the line, but it still seems odd when, as you say, they are designing a very strange manned launch vehicle when many existing ones could, presumably be made man friendly at a lesser cost. ... Ares I is there to hide some of the development costs for Ares V, which would be the largest launch vehicle ever built. ... They will not be released because they contain proprietary cost data that is exempt from FOIA. ...
(sci.space.shuttle) - Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?
... And cost is not price. ... >the weight goes up the cost of the launch goes up. ... >payload is a direct factor in launch vehicle selection. ... >weight of the spacecraft increases during the design phase, ...
(sci.astro) - Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?
... And cost is not price. ... >the weight goes up the cost of the launch goes up. ... >payload is a direct factor in launch vehicle selection. ... >weight of the spacecraft increases during the design phase, ...
(sci.space.policy) - Re: Hydrogen dangerous for the environment ! ! !
... "Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message ... A NASDA report shows that the H-IIA Launch Vehicle projects cost ... satellite cost about 7 billion yen, representing a total cost of about 19 ...
(sci.energy.hydrogen) - Re: Launch costs seem irrelevant
... >> To get a good base going on the moon, and enable some crew deliveries, ... >low earth orbit) only pays for the launch vehicle ... >and the launch, not the payload. ... >cost more than the launch vehicle. ...
(sci.space.policy) |
|
