Re: SpaceDev Claims Lunar Missions Can Be Completed For Less Than $10Bn
- From: Joe Strout <joe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:59:34 -0700
In article <1132700081.610487.287690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Space Cadet" <kaw211@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey have you seen this? How pausible is this and if (I know a very big
> if) someone where to pull this off before 2018, what would
> NASA's/Congress' reaction would be?
Someone *who*? Who do you think has $10G to spend on lunar missions,
other than NASA, who's already committed to another architecture?
Apart from the irrelevancy of it, the report seems quite sensible to me.
Best,
- Joe
,------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Joseph J. Strout Check out the Mac Web Directory: |
| joe@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.macwebdir.com |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SpaceDev Claims Lunar Missions Can Be Completed For Less Than $10Bn
- From: frédéric haessig
- Re: SpaceDev Claims Lunar Missions Can Be Completed For Less Than $10Bn
- From: spacecentral
- Re: SpaceDev Claims Lunar Missions Can Be Completed For Less Than $10Bn
- Prev by Date: Re: reusable motors
- Next by Date: Re: the "Spencer Launcher"
- Previous by thread: strong ET
- Next by thread: Re: SpaceDev Claims Lunar Missions Can Be Completed For Less Than $10Bn
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
