Re: Falcon 1 Overflight

In article <FtWdnZxsvsSg3hrenZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Ted Molczan" <molczan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> >That'll teach him to take the air force and Boelock to court.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> That thought occurred to me also; this looks a bit like obstruction.
> >>
> >> Pat
> >
> > More likely this is the Army flexing its muscle-->proving to Musk that
> > he needs to consult with them more closely.
>
> Presumably users have to apply well in advance for clearance to use the
> range, so I suspect some sort of miscommunication by one party or another.


I hope SpaceX have their own guards watching the launcher.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Blue Streak
    ... >for Pat to provide the obscure pictures. ... I don't think they ever played with rocket-boosted bombers; ... See the pretty Super Sabre on its launcher?: ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Bird flu bites Tesco?
    ... >Are you saying that you *currently* have British security clearance? ... but Pat might not be able to answer if he ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)
  • Re: Polly is SAFE - Hurray!!!
    ... : Best Regards ... : pat on the hill ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.crafts.textiles.quilting)
  • Re: Whats taters?
    ... The price was the same, ... was the taste. ... Pat ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Dave Weckl
    ... Patience, grasshopper. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.music.makers.percussion)
Quantcast