Re: Excellent Article on VSE
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:38:58 GMT
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:28:09 GMT, in a place far, far away, Stephen
Horgan <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>>>I think that he establishes that the VSE is a basis for exploring the
>>>moon, as opposed to visiting it. That same architecture further
>>>developed may also take NASA to Mars and elsewhere. There doesn't seem
>>>to be a realistic alternative in technology terms.
>>
>>If you mean instead *politically* realistic, that may (or not) be
>>true. It's certainly not realistic in technology terms. We could get
>>much more exploration (and other things) for the money with different
>>architectures.
>
>There don't seem to be alternatives to the base technologies NASA are
>proposing.
Without knowing what you mean by "base technologies" (I'm not sure
that you do, either), I can't respond to this.
>Can they be deployed more efficiently or by other parties?
>Those seem to be the points of debate.
If they are, then they're the wrong points, and questions. It's not
NASA's "technologies" that are flawed, but (as I said) their
architectural approach.
.
- References:
- Excellent Article on VSE
- From: Stephen Horgan
- Re: Excellent Article on VSE
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Excellent Article on VSE
- From: Stephen Horgan
- Re: Excellent Article on VSE
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Excellent Article on VSE
- From: Stephen Horgan
- Excellent Article on VSE
- Prev by Date: Re: Spacex launch (or lack of it)
- Next by Date: Re: Excellent Article on VSE
- Previous by thread: Re: Excellent Article on VSE
- Next by thread: Re: Excellent Article on VSE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|