Re: More ET foam woes
- From: Len Lekx <LFLekx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:38:31 -0500
On 6 Dec 2005 09:27:05 -0800, lifeform1@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >come by. Hydrogen peroxide doesn't perform as well (although it has
>Nasty qualities.
Just like other oxidizers. I wouldn't want to get to close to
nitrogen tetroxide.
>> Peroxide is my oxidizer of choice. So what
>that it's nasty.
>I like to breathe.
Which is worse - burning your lungs in peroxide vapour, or freezing
them in a cloud of super-cold oxygen?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: lifeform1
- Re: More ET foam woes
- References:
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: Len Lekx
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: Len Lekx
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: lifeform1
- Re: More ET foam woes
- Prev by Date: Re: More ET foam woes
- Next by Date: Re: NASA should send many SMALL Mars rovers to survey
- Previous by thread: Re: More ET foam woes
- Next by thread: Re: More ET foam woes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
