Re: More ET foam woes
- From: Len Lekx <LFLekx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:30:03 -0500
On 7 Dec 2005 11:43:37 -0800, lifeform1@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > Then why, for curiositys' sake, are people so fearful of it? Every
>It's not fear, it's common sense.
If you take precautions when handling something potentially
harmful, that's common sense. When you don't use something at all
because of what MAY happen, that's fear. ;-)
>Another good and sensible argument for using oxygen as an oxidizer, is
>the fundamental advantage that once you do get to orbit, whatever you
And another good and sensible argument for using peroxide is that
it can be used as a monopropellant for your RCS... as was (IIRC)
tested for use in the X-15 vehicles in the 60s.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: lifeform1
- Re: More ET foam woes
- References:
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: Len Lekx
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: lifeform1
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: Len Lekx
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: Len Lekx
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: John Schilling
- Re: More ET foam woes
- From: lifeform1
- Re: More ET foam woes
- Prev by Date: Re: Russia, Iran, and NASA
- Next by Date: Re: More ET foam woes
- Previous by thread: peroxide and life support (was Re: More ET foam woes)
- Next by thread: Re: More ET foam woes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|