Re: Griffin wants orbiting fuel depot
- From: "Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Dec 2005 13:48:45 -0800
I'm having to edit and repost this reply in part because of my usual
dyslexic syntext and spelling, plus my PC having been so badly
malware/fuckware infected, and also because the ISP/GOOGLE Usenet
simply hasn't been responding according to plan.
I had previously offered that "LL1/ME-L1 is somewhat LEO if you're
talking about supporting interplanetary stuff."
>Rand Simberg; No, it's not. It's most of the way to the moon.
I most certainly understand what LL1/ME-L1 and LEO means, as being that
LL1 or ME-L1 is supposedly within 60,000 km of the moon (potentially
getting much closer towards the moon if there's a good deal of mass
involved), and that LEO represents being situated well below the cloak
and thereby protection of the Van Allen expanse that usually represents
being less than 500 km from the surface of mother Earth. Thus obviously
I was pulling your leg, but only in a good way that's relevant to the
future of greatly improving lunar and interplanetary travels, whereas
yout thoughts were being clearly mindset along the lines of local
thermal nuclear tactical support which demands being as close to Earth
as possible.
>Rand Simberg;
>It takes considerable delta V to get back to earth from EML-1.
Very good example of your naysay mindset being out of context and of
intellectually bigoted incorrectness to boot.
A return to Earth, as for taking an exit away from LL1/ME-L1 that's
intentionally leveraged as being a wee bit pulled towards Earth to
start with (plus centrifugal forces) is offering something less than a
zero delta V, whereas it takes absolutely nothing but at the very most
a good shot of flatulence directed at the moon in order to get yourself
headed back towards mother Earth. Just cutting the docking clams that's
keeping your spacecraft safely parked at the CM/ISS depot is all that
it should take.
Quite obviously you either know of nothing about the possibilities of
what the LSE-CM/ISS represents, or you're another born again liar, and
perhaps that's because you're such an incest cloned intellectual bigot
that's on brown-nosed steroids, with your NASA/Apollo or bust mindset
that's stuck in reverse status quo of your being pro perpetrated
cold-war at absolutely any cost, as well as without a stitch of
remorse.
Obviously your EML-1 (Earth/Moon L1) is not the least bit pertaining to
LL1 or ME-L1 (Moon/Earth L1), or were you just being Usenet status quo
funny?
On the other hand, perhaps "that's because you're utterly innocent of
orbital mechanics"?
It's clear that you're another 100% mainstream in-the-box sort of guy,
somewhat of another status quo stuck in a serious brown-nosed rut sort
of fool on the hill. Is this your normal Skull and Bones mindset, or is
there an even darker naysay side yet to come.
If my PC and ISP/Usenet channel or ISP pathway wasn't being so
continually cloak and dagger terminated and otherwise MI6/NSA~CIA
malware/fuckware infected, as such I could manage to contribute much
more. Such as right now there's no significant problems with my
utilizing other than GOOGLE/Usenet internet functions. Naturally, each
of my email accounts are continually made chuck full of their
malware/fuckware efforts to further terminate my PC. Gee whiz folks, I
guess there must be some extremely interesting reasons as to why I'm
being so attacked.
-
Brad Guth
.
- References:
- Griffin wants orbiting fuel depot
- From: Richard Morris
- Re: Griffin wants orbiting fuel depot
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: Griffin wants orbiting fuel depot
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Griffin wants orbiting fuel depot
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: Griffin wants orbiting fuel depot
- From: Rand Simberg
- Griffin wants orbiting fuel depot
- Prev by Date: Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- Next by Date: Successful Ariane 5 Launch
- Previous by thread: Re: Griffin wants orbiting fuel depot
- Next by thread: msnbc.com (Oberg): The real promise of Japan's asteroid mission
- Index(es):