Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- From: "Pete Lynn" <pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:02:17 GMT
"Henry Spencer" <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:IsxqFn.5Kn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Agreed. They're all too likely to find their insulation
> frozen to the tank. They're starting down the road
> several groups have followed in the past, which
> typically ends in a change of approach after the full
> complexity of purges etc. sinks in.
But would not such insulation be constructed like a tent fly without
direct contact to the tank? Especially if it only need help mitigate
increased heat transfer due to wind. This should not be the least bit
difficult or expensive.
Pete.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- From: John Schilling
- Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- From: Tom Cuddihy
- Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- References:
- Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- Prev by Date: Re: Flight Test Vasimr?
- Next by Date: Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- Previous by thread: Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- Next by thread: Re: Space X January 2006 Update
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
