Re: Final destinations in space

From: raphfrk@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 27 Jan 2006 05:57:16 -0800

Monte Davis wrote:
> royls@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >Uh, it happened, just over 60 years ago.
>
> And lasted four years...

Because the US didn't have the desire to lay waste to all of its
potential enemies. In the future the benefit of such a breakthrough
might be larger and perhaps the inventing nation would be less rights
respecting.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Final destinations in space
  - From: John Savard

References:
- Final destinations in space
  - From: Jim McCauley
- Re: Final destinations in space
  - From: royls
- Re: Final destinations in space
  - From: Monte Davis
- Re: Final destinations in space
  - From: royls
- Re: Final destinations in space
  - From: Monte Davis
- Re: Final destinations in space
  - From: royls
- Re: Final destinations in space
  - From: Monte Davis

Prev by Date: Re: No Nukes in Space
Next by Date: Re: One Small Step
Previous by thread: Re: Final destinations in space
Next by thread: Re: Final destinations in space
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: What is the purpose of NASA?
... > It's high ground. ... This is sarcasm... ... Monte Davis ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.space.shuttle)
Re: What should they do when (if) they get there?
... >Monte Davis wrote: ... >>is going around in circles" seems to have caused a lot of people to ... Because it costs too much just to get there, a problem that NASA ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.space.policy)
Re: NASA formally unveils lunar exploration architecture
... Monte Davis wrote: ... but they'll be clearer as a result of the ... Jim Davis ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.space.policy)