Re: No Nukes in Space
- From: "ramiga" <gnossis1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Jan 2006 05:06:49 -0800
To the group:
We need to think and not idealize situations based on power. We have
had nuclear accidents. Does this not bother you? Will you please tell
me the results of blast over Florida and how I am wrong about those
resutls. How about blast in the atmosphere, before the Van Allen Belt.
And beyond the Van Allen belt. What about blast in space? Will the
resulting radiation cloud impact future space missions or not?
Speak to the subjects. What is the most accident proof technology we
can use. If all you have is nuclear in the present fomulas of usage,
then we do have a problem. Can you even think in terms of fusion?
Can you think?
peace, mmgr
no nukes in space
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No Nukes in Space
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: No Nukes in Space
- From: Len Lekx
- Re: No Nukes in Space
- References:
- No Nukes in Space
- From: ramiga
- Re: No Nukes in Space
- From: Damon Hill
- Re: No Nukes in Space
- From: Alex Terrell
- Re: No Nukes in Space
- From: ramiga
- Re: No Nukes in Space
- From: Brian Thorn
- No Nukes in Space
- Prev by Date: Re: One Small Step
- Next by Date: Re: No Nukes in Space
- Previous by thread: Re: No Nukes in Space
- Next by thread: Re: No Nukes in Space
- Index(es):