Re: Proposed lunar energy storage system

Steve Hix,
Is Nog and the likes of yourself sequestered into thinking entirely
inside the box just because of being so afraid of what's outside?

Nog
Lunar night? The dark side is always night. The daylight side is always
light. It's rotational period equals it orbital period. Why use combersome
flywheels when solar cells can do the same thing without moving parts. 100
150 watt panels will generate 15 k watts 110/220 volts. 1000 panes will
generate 150 kilowatts. Would it make more sense to bring the technology up
to the moon to manufacture them up there? There is plenty of sand and
silica. It would be full time power since the sun always shines. You could
run power lines to the dark side and illuminate it.

Earthshine is capable of making a lunar nighttime into nearly as bright
as by day upon a cloudy Earth.

Obviously PV cells can not store energy, and they certainly do not like
hard-X-rays.

Obviously taking micro impacts upon the likes of PV cells isn't going
to last for long.

Obviously lord "Nog" is another primo naysayer and golden brown-nosed
rusemaster to boot.

However, the running of power lines to the opposit side of the moon
isn't such a bad idea.

Each human that's accomplishing any good on the nighttime/earthshine
illuminated moon needs the benefit of having a minimum energy resource
of 10 KW (maximum of 100 kw).

Of course, our moon is extremely dark and nasty, deeply dusty and
downright lethal in more unfortunate ways than you've been informed by
way of your pagan religion of NASA/Apollo.
-
Brad Guth

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Proposed lunar energy storage system
    ... Lunar night? ... The dark side is always night. ... What moon are you talking about? ... facing the earth, ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Bad News for Moon Hoax Buffs
    ... as offering a relatively dark surface that's having ... the probe obtaining this image vanished under meters of dark moon dust ... and eventually inside the Lamborghini ... my lunar terraforming notions of bombing our moon with the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Lunochod 1 and 2 mission photos..
    ... Have you noticed how all of the Usenet folks and spooks are so deeply focused upon those supposed surface images that oddly do not match up with images obtained from orbit. ... Not knowing their applied optical spectrum filters, of what's still most interesting about Zond-7 is that it robotically had photographically outperformed even our Apollo orbital images by way of capturing a full Earth depicted above the moon that's representing itself as a relatively dark reddish/brown surface. ... If Earth is typically worth 36% albedo, and if the moon being supposedly of a 12% average albedo, then where's the problem of other images having included the likes of folks subsequently recording the likes of Venus, Jupiter and even a somewhat dim Mars above the lunar horizon, then of course the Sirius star system which must have been in hiding as never to being seen. ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectificat
    ... It's somewhere above that physically dark lunar horizon, ... I know for an absolute matter of science and of physics fact that Venus ... dark moon itself, and that of mother Earth that isn't half as humanly ... On at least these three Apollo missions of A-11, A-14, A-16, and since ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: Whats New - Bob Park
    ... EXPOSING THE DARK SIDE OF WHAT'S NEW. ... told the NY Times last week, "the retreat from the Moon to low Earth ... Alas, WN makes mistakes too. ... ISS FUBAR should be boosted into lunar polar ...
    (sci.physics)