Re: Post-Cantorian Post-Goedelian Theory
- From: "Ross A. Finlayson" <raf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Mar 2006 17:33:57 -0800
William Mook wrote:
Roy and Bill were having a discussion about interstellar payloads one
day and Roy let out with a shout;
I wrote:
Also I have presented a
post-Cantorian and post-Goedelian theory of mathematical logic.
Would you care to speak on the telephone? I would like to speak with
you.
A theory is a post-Cantorian, post-Goedelian, super-Euclidean theory, A
for axiom, an axiomless system of natural deduction in terms of the
foundations of mathematical logic in technical philosophy. I'm happy
to have discussed it, and would be happy to discuss it.
I do not consider myself a Wolframite. I browsed, read, _A New Kind of
Science_, and can be honest in saying that it really didn't do it for
me. Genetic programming is simply not a straight line, although it
does optimize. It's about what it is, cellular automata and so forth,
I think there are continua in nature. It's a great self-published
screed with the author holding the copyrights.
The universe is infinite. When I say universe, I don't necessarily
mean the physical universe, instead the realm or domain of discourse,
the universe of all objects, and their relations. When I say universe,
generally it means the entire universe.
Excuse me, I'm not Roy. Hi, Rand. Hey, Spencer. How's it going
there, Ian. Mook, Brad, Jacob, y'all.
Have a good one,
Ross
.
- References:
- Post-Cantorian Post-Goedelian Theory
- From: William Mook
- Post-Cantorian Post-Goedelian Theory
- Prev by Date: Re: Scientist warns that public knowledge of space engineering fixes for global warming may be undesirable
- Next by Date: Re: Small interstellar payloads
- Previous by thread: Post-Cantorian Post-Goedelian Theory
- Next by thread: Re: SSTO to LEO, 80,000 pound payload or Bust. [was Re: Bigelow launch vehicle mistake]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|