Re: Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes
- From: Jim Davis <jimdavis2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Mar 2006 20:02:03 +0200
Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
He *advocates* space colonization, Jim.
Indeed. With all the passion - and all the consistency - of a
televangelist with a Rolex watch, Armani suit, and BMW urging the
faithful to send in those checks.
That's more than most and a step in the right direction.
Sure. Nothing will convince people to pull up stakes and head to L5
more than hysteria and hypocrisy.
There are a lot of *silent* space colonization advocates out
there.
By "out there" you of course refer to earth, right?
Jim Davis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes
- From: Thomas Lee Elifritz
- Re: Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes
- References:
- Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes
- From: G. L. Bradford
- Re: Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes
- From: Thomas Lee Elifritz
- Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes
- Prev by Date: Re: Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes
- Next by Date: Re: SpaceX armchair quarterbacking
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes
- Next by thread: Re: Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes
- Index(es):