Re: Is USA going to be embarrased by China getting to Mars first



schumache1234@xxxxxxxxx wrote in
news:1144564372.493336.148410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

I think we have another space race on our hands. America says it is
going to the Moon and then on to Mars (I bet the money never comes
through for the latter).
Why go to the Moon and especially if the plan is to set up a base which
is going to cost a fortune.
We have supposedly been there, so why not push our boundaries a bit
further and get on with the real job of landing some people on Mars.
If China simply sets its goal as safetly landing some astronauts on
Mars with no plan for their return, they could easily achieve this
within a few years.
We can assume they would provide enough resources so that they could
set up a base and be semi-self sufficient .ie enough food to survive
their optomistic lifetimes.
apparently China already has ten times the number of staff employed in
their space industry. India and Russia must also be thinking along the
same lines.
America and Europe would probably be best to rely on private enterprise
with a privately funded attempt to land on Mars which is really not any
more stupid or dangerous than the first attempts at getting to the
South Pole or to the top of Mt. Everest.
I am pretty sure that Burt Rutan would be thinking along these lines
(he actually has said this to me) and with the right finances would aim
to achieve this within his lifetime.



They could open up a Chinese Take-out, then our guys would have a place to
eat once we got there.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
    ... The one other close location in this solar system, ... For example, in the case of water alone, then on the Moon we do not ... On the other hand Mars has tons of water. ... >> will only become another NASA mini-disaster that will set back any ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Ice on Mars South Pole Is Deep and Wide
    ... they should be talking to us about our somewhat salty old moon that's ... life might have once upon a time existed on Mars, ... An Earth w/o magnetosphere, w/o moon is simply a much larger Mars. ... Even if we're talking 1% Earth wet, Mars is missing most of its salt. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Manned interplanetary travel is IMPOSSIBLE today, but PROBABLE soon.
    ... is a SHOW STOPPER for any manned missions beyond the moon. ... Earth lifeforms do not have the equivilent of several meters of water ... between them and the nasty radiation. ... the surface of Mars is quite radioactive. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Fusion Propulsion
    ... An ovoid disc shaped craft with thick polyethylene skin penetrated ... Span the outer solar system in a matter of weeks to months ... solar system (hours to the moon and days to Mars at 1 gee) also avoids ... Actually 1/3 gee for a mars bound flight ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Space exploration for the rest of us
    ... the moon inside of fifty years. ... Let alone mars. ... in the same way.....they can't justify either mission. ... And if we could launch 'X' number of them, for the cost of one shuttle launch, and the money were to re-allocated in that manner...they'll still make signifigant money on it. ...
    (sci.space.policy)

Quantcast