Re: LSAM

Eric Chomko,
Where have the found helium on the moon? No atmosphere, remember?
Good grief and let us put Jesus Christ back on a stick. What naysay
planet of such brown-nosed and incest cloned Bigots-R-Us are you from?

You have never, ever, shown how anything is gointo be physically tied to
the moon, go up into space to something else and stay anchored. I already
mentioned that nothing you have shown has the shear strength to allow for
such a things.
Once again, your being intellectually blind and otherwise such a
born-again pagan mainstream status quo sort of guy is what makes my
past several years of offerings (proof that it has been doable) just so
WMD stealth like. Too bad that yourself and of your naysay mindset
haven't the basic skills necessary to wipe your own ***, much less
have taken the LSE-CM/ISS to heart. In fact, if you were any more
naysay/negative, as such you'd become the next available black hole.

You're obviously another happy camper as being just another incest
cloned fool on the same old NASA/Apollo or bust hill, that's having to
continually exclude upon whatever's of evidence and/or of hard-science,
and of otherwise having to ignore the regular laws of physics that
rocks your pathetic boat, whereas instead you're having to accept the
mainstream status quo of their infomercial-science without a speck of
remorse for the past, present or future.

You and of your naysay paganism simply refuse to believe in or much
less share in anything that rocks your pathetic good ship LOLLIPOP.
Perhaps the only thing you're good for is starting up WW-III.

All I can say is, keep up the good brown-nosed work, as that's exactly
what Hitler and of his collaborating Jews needed in order to pull off
their fiasco. The same goes for your actions having supported our
perpetrated cold-war plus that of our pagan born-again resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush), whereas without such an audience of supportive pagan
minions as yourself we simply couldn't have caused so much collateral
damage and carnage of the innocent, nor having recently trashed mother
Earth in the process.

For a perfectly good example; if our NASA or even the USSR actually
had such nifty AI/robotic fly-by-rocket landers, such as those as you
claim we supposedly had for those Surveyor and even of the subsequent
USSR/Russian robotic missions, as of such capability starting off way
back in the good old mid 60's, whereas such we certainly would have
been utilizing those sorts of supposedly proven flying machines all
along.

With such a nifty fly-by-rocket lander that was supposedly so capably
AI/robotic and thus robo-pilot proficient of safely deploying the badly
needed tonnage to the surface of Mars, whereas this very same
technology would obviously have represented the capability of having
deployed tens of such tonnes per other essential deployments of the
much needed science and applied mission technologies (including if need
be a few of us humans) as safely deposited onto our extremely nearby
though physically dark (AKA nearly coal/carbon-soot like) and otherwise
reactive nasty moon.

Just for being such a good little brown-nosed minion of a sport that
you obviously are;
Because robotics don't amount to 1% the overall cost plus so many other
considerations of having to involve a human pilotted mission, and
obviously of such robotics as intended for our moon that don't even
have to be all that AI rated, because of their being so easily remote
operated from our terrestrial ground control that's within a mere 2.5
seconds of loop-reaction delay, and thereby offers a zero risk factor
to our frail DNA. So therefore, Eric Chomko, what do you suppose we're
still waiting for?

My LSE-CM/ISS has in fact been technically doable within existing
applied technology ever since the Apollo era. Only the most dumb and
dumber fools and intellectual bigots like yourself are of those unable
to see the light and of the absolutely tremendous positive
considerations. You only see and/or promote upon whatever's negative
and/or of what's supposedly insurmountable, yet you've provided no such
physics nor hard-science in order to back that up.

You have never, ever, shown how anything is gointo be physically tied to
the moon, go up into space to something else and stay anchored. I already
mentioned that nothing you have shown has the shear strength to allow for
such a things.
How exactly does one go about explaining and/or physically having to
show anything to such a born-again pagan of a blind fool, of such a
heathen that's so easily dumbfounded and that otherwise hasn't so much
as a clue of being snookered by folks that supposedly had all of "the
right stuff"?

As to the yaysay/naysay list that pertains to the LL-1 zone, and of the
LSE-CM/ISS;
Where is it? Other than in some flap of your brain I mean. You really
ought to get a grip on what's real and what's imagined.
For the past several years, I've already posted most of everything a
good hundred times over, although I'll obviously have to re-collect my
information and polish up my thoughts into the necessary LeapFrog
format, of providing such a side-by-side list, that'll only make your
type as being all the more pathetic.

You're so chuck full of your own incest crapolla and of all the
associated infomercial-science that you're even rejecting upon the
4.8+GPa worth of continuous basalt fiber (if need be in a tapered or
stepped format) that's as-is way more than sufficient for accommodating
the primary tether(s). Obviously in your case there's no amount of
applied physics or math that's going to be sufficient. Unlike the ESE
tether of such horrifically spendy and extremely complicated to utilize
CNT, The LSE tether of such common composite basalt fibers as easily
produced from local lunar basalt, as having no dimensional or other
shape limitations whatsoever, not to mention the 1/6th gravity at a
mere 1738 km to start off with is doable.
-
Brad Guth

.