Re: LSAM

Brad Guth (ieisbradguth@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
: Eric Chomko,
: >Where have the found helium on the moon? No atmosphere, remember?

: Good grief and let us put Jesus Christ back on a stick. What naysay
: planet of such brown-nosed and incest cloned Bigots-R-Us are you from?

I asked a question. Please answer it. No need for swearing, even your
gosh-darn, tinker's damn, scotology...

You act as if anyone that questions your methods is so sort of demon. If
you REALLY had something then you'd actually welcome the feedback just so
you could shoot it down. Playing devil's advocate in science and
engineering is part of it. Am I supposed to merrily agree with every damn
thing you state?! Is that what you expect?

You make me wonder about your whole idiot-savant persona, as lacking a
second part...

: >You have never, ever, shown how anything is gointo be physically tied to
: >the moon, go up into space to something else and stay anchored. I already
: >mentioned that nothing you have shown has the shear strength to allow for
: >such a things.

: Once again, your being intellectually blind and otherwise such a
: born-again pagan mainstream status quo sort of guy is what makes my
: past several years of offerings (proof that it has been doable) just so
: WMD stealth like. Too bad that yourself and of your naysay mindset
: haven't the basic skills necessary to wipe your own ***, much less
: have taken the LSE-CM/ISS to heart. In fact, if you were any more
: naysay/negative, as such you'd become the next available black hole.

Insults, but no technology or physics for the technology.

: You're obviously another happy camper as being just another incest
: cloned fool on the same old NASA/Apollo or bust hill, that's having to
: continually exclude upon whatever's of evidence and/or of hard-science,
: and of otherwise having to ignore the regular laws of physics that
: rocks your pathetic boat, whereas instead you're having to accept the
: mainstream status quo of their infomercial-science without a speck of
: remorse for the past, present or future.

: You and of your naysay paganism simply refuse to believe in or much
: less share in anything that rocks your pathetic good ship LOLLIPOP.
: Perhaps the only thing you're good for is starting up WW-III.

Nope, your brand of ignorance is what starts wars.

: All I can say is, keep up the good brown-nosed work, as that's exactly
: what Hitler and of his collaborating Jews needed in order to pull off
: their fiasco. The same goes for your actions having supported our
: perpetrated cold-war plus that of our pagan born-again resident LLPOF
: warlord(GW Bush), whereas without such an audience of supportive pagan
: minions as yourself we simply couldn't have caused so much collateral
: damage and carnage of the innocent, nor having recently trashed mother
: Earth in the process.

When in doubt, Brad goes politically berserk....

: For a perfectly good example; if our NASA or even the USSR actually
: had such nifty AI/robotic fly-by-rocket landers, such as those as you
: claim we supposedly had for those Surveyor and even of the subsequent
: USSR/Russian robotic missions, as of such capability starting off way
: back in the good old mid 60's, whereas such we certainly would have
: been utilizing those sorts of supposedly proven flying machines all
: along.

: With such a nifty fly-by-rocket lander that was supposedly so capably
: AI/robotic and thus robo-pilot proficient of safely deploying the badly
: needed tonnage to the surface of Mars, whereas this very same
: technology would obviously have represented the capability of having
: deployed tens of such tonnes per other essential deployments of the
: much needed science and applied mission technologies (including if need
: be a few of us humans) as safely deposited onto our extremely nearby
: though physically dark (AKA nearly coal/carbon-soot like) and otherwise
: reactive nasty moon.

Can't seem to find sodium chloride in this section:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon#Composition

: Just for being such a good little brown-nosed minion of a sport that
: you obviously are;
: Because robotics don't amount to 1% the overall cost plus so many other
: considerations of having to involve a human pilotted mission, and
: obviously of such robotics as intended for our moon that don't even
: have to be all that AI rated, because of their being so easily remote
: operated from our terrestrial ground control that's within a mere 2.5
: seconds of loop-reaction delay, and thereby offers a zero risk factor
: to our frail DNA. So therefore, Eric Chomko, what do you suppose we're
: still waiting for?

No doubt funding.

: My LSE-CM/ISS has in fact been technically doable within existing
: applied technology ever since the Apollo era. Only the most dumb and
: dumber fools and intellectual bigots like yourself are of those unable
: to see the light and of the absolutely tremendous positive
: considerations. You only see and/or promote upon whatever's negative
: and/or of what's supposedly insurmountable, yet you've provided no such
: physics nor hard-science in order to back that up.

Just reading the page gives me a headache:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-cm-ccm-01.htm

: >You have never, ever, shown how anything is gointo be physically tied to
: >the moon, go up into space to something else and stay anchored. I already
: >mentioned that nothing you have shown has the shear strength to allow for
: >such a things.

: How exactly does one go about explaining and/or physically having to
: show anything to such a born-again pagan of a blind fool, of such a
: heathen that's so easily dumbfounded and that otherwise hasn't so much
: as a clue of being snookered by folks that supposedly had all of "the
: right stuff"?

: As to the yaysay/naysay list that pertains to the LL-1 zone, and of the
: LSE-CM/ISS;

I've read the page. You expect to drop a tether from a distance 58,000 km
from the moon to the moon and anchor it?

: >Where is it? Other than in some flap of your brain I mean. You really
: >ought to get a grip on what's real and what's imagined.

: For the past several years, I've already posted most of everything a
: good hundred times over, although I'll obviously have to re-collect my
: information and polish up my thoughts into the necessary LeapFrog
: format, of providing such a side-by-side list, that'll only make your
: type as being all the more pathetic.

Yes, clarity is your strong suit.

: You're so chuck full of your own incest crapolla and of all the
: associated infomercial-science that you're even rejecting upon the
: 4.8+GPa worth of continuous basalt fiber (if need be in a tapered or
: stepped format) that's as-is way more than sufficient for accommodating
: the primary tether(s). Obviously in your case there's no amount of
: applied physics or math that's going to be sufficient. Unlike the ESE
: tether of such horrifically spendy and extremely complicated to utilize
: CNT, The LSE tether of such common composite basalt fibers as easily
: produced from local lunar basalt, as having no dimensional or other
: shape limitations whatsoever, not to mention the 1/6th gravity at a
: mere 1738 km to start off with is doable.

1738 km? I thought you started from 58,000 km? Please explain what the
1738 km is vs. the 58,000 km, distance?

Eric

: -
: Brad Guth

.