Re: LSAM

First of all, I am not sure that you can have a satellite at whatever
altitude capable of supporting 20,000 miles of rope. Yes, I have heard
of this idea and I know it did not originate with you. Perhaps it is
my lack of unintelligence, but I cannot understand how something can
'hang' there, against the force of gravity, attached to a satellite in
a geosynchronous orbit.
tomact,
You'll need a little basic math and perhaps even a little faith in the
regular laws of physics (similar to what supposedly makes the Tomcat
Spaceplane doable). Trust me, the mutual gravity forces as well as for
the available centripetal force that's easily configured to accommodate
as much or as little as you'd like, is offering way more than enough to
pull that tether as tight as you'd like.

If you can manage to stipulate with a straight ***-crack that the
Lunar Space Elevator "did not originate with you", then you're a
self-certified LLPOF sort of guy, and perhaps even more of a two-faced
and pagan incest cloned brown-nose than I'd previously thought
possible.

Because I'm such an honest and good hearted sport, I'll relocate a few
extra pages of LL-1 information and of a few other nifty LSE related
engineering and application facts, other than my own, that'll only
further establish that all of this has been quite doable. Otherwise,
as depicted upon as little as a cheap restaurant placemat, I can easily
draw this one out, whereas obviously my having been sharing this as a
Usenet topic of worthy think-tank considerations on behalf of the sorts
of folks that claim to already know all there is to know, yet seemingly
they only respond with their usual flak since it's not already in their
NOVA/LeapFrog infomercial-science format, is clearly why such honest
words and of the hard-science combined along with the regular laws of
physics means absolutely nothing to such certified pagan naysayers that
would just as soon shoot off both of their own two feet as well as the
innocent feet of whomever is standing too near, as opposed to their
giving an honest inch.

As you have to damn good and well already know, it's actually not so
much working "against the force of gravity", as that would be not only
pathetic but just plain stupid. Just the opposite, it's slightly (to
whatever extent necessary) outside of the lunar grip and utilizing the
focused gravity assist of mother Earth, plus taking advantage of as
little and/or as much as necessary of centripetal force from the
applied amount of CM(counter mass) in order to further accomplish the
given task of not only staying relatively put but pulling upon the
tether(s) to whatever degree of tension you'd like.

Even though the full blown LSE-CM/ISS of 256e6t as a tethered
TLGSO(Tethered Lunar GSO) satellite is certainly capable of becoming a
wee bit complex, however it's otherwise not all that physics
complicated unless you allow your naysayism of intellectual bigotry to
rule the universe and of the flat Earth upon which so much of our
intellectual racist arrogance is based.

The weight of the 'rope' would almost certainly bring the satellite
crashing to the Earth, not to mention the difficulty of constructing
such a thing, or the possibility of airplanes running into the rope.
There's your first naysay problem; Earth has absolutely nothing
whatsoever to do with the LSE(Lunar Space Elevator), as in where is
Earth mentioned anywhere within that LSE statement?

It's not even remotely related to any potential of whatever "rope" and
given mass of attachment that could be falling upon Earth. Other than
the gravity of Earth having provided the LSE with the extra benefit of
a gravity assist that's having created the mutual LL-1 zone, and of
somewhat buffering on behalf of whatever's within as being somewhat
gravity nullified, as well as continually formulated between and thus
continually aligned with Earth and our moon (+/- a touch of solar
influence) at roughly 15.25% the distance away from the moon, as
otherwise the LSE(Lunar Space Elevator) has absolutely nothing
whatsoever physically to do with your extremely racist and bigoted to
death Earth that's intent upon going global warming postal as we speak.

No wonder you're so totally and pathetically screwed up. You don't
know the fundamental difference between the ESE and that of the LSE, or
perhaps you simply can't figure out which of the two orbs is the moon?

The "rope" being perhaps more approprately represented as a large
diameter straw/hallow like element made extensively of basalt fiber
that's already capable of 4.8+ GPa, as such isn't ever going to fall
out of the black sky upon Earth, at least not if having been attached
into the moon and on the other end connected to the CM/ISS that's
interactively positioned so as to give whatever lift or tension is
necessary. The one an only place this primary tether can ever collapse
upon is the moon itself, and if that ever happened it could soon be
reestablished since reaction thrusters onboard the CM/ISS are going
make damn certain that this massive Chinese station-keeping platform
that's offering the 1e9 m3 abode as a space depot is going to remain
available. The tether DIPOLE ELEMENT that's much less robust and
considerably longer so as to reach to within 4r of mother Earth could
be of some concern, although the relative low density per km should
insure the vast bulk if not entirely should vaporise itself upon
reentry. Of the dipole element science and the nearby star-wars
platform, if being allowed to regulate itself for residing at most any
given point along this dipole line that's connected to the CM/ISS, as
well as for such having sufficient reaction thrusters of it's own, plus
the last resort option of self-destruct capability would insure that
the multi-hundred if not multi-thousand tonnage of whatever that
platform amounts to is a none issue.

As you already know of the old shuttle/tether deployed experiment that
was getting impressive results well before the energy was too much to
manage, just think of what a dipole of roughly 375,000 km and having
our moon as connected at one end should capably offer as terawatts of
continuous energy once we figure out how to utilize such potential
without getting ourselves summarily fried in the process.

A lot of this 'wire energy' phenomena requires scientific explanation.
If it is the result of Earth's magnetic field, it may not work on the
Moon which has a very small iron core. If it is Zero Point Energy then
it may work anywhere if the wire is in a vacuum.
It's not so much the supposed iron core (which could actually be more
of a iron alloy or some other metallic composition of a shell like
interior as further indicated by why of our moon having such horrific
mascons), as it's the combined surface area of nearly 40 million square
km that's acting as one polarity of this electrically charged dipole
element, that could be of an absolutely horrific DC potential or
perhaps offering that of a slowly alternating current having amperage
that'll more than blow your socks off. I'm thinking the AC frequency
of 2.5514e-6 Hz could be the case.

I am curious if someone in cyberland has additional information on this
subject. If so, please reply.
They certainly do, but it has always been another one of those Usenet
taboo/nondisclosure topics, or at best a need to know situation that'll
tend to bring down lots more mainstream status quo flak than honest
science.

A search for * shuttle tether * or perhaps something * STS-75 tether *
or even go for * UV tether video * will each get you started. I
believe the original tether science team was Italian. Then shortly
thereafter we essentially broke our shuttle and having exterminated
another crew plus whatever payload, and nothing since has gotten
launched on behalf of the tether dipole research. There's actually a
lot more interesting science and of UFO information associated with the
STS-75 mission than what was tether related.
http://www.rense.com/nasaufo/nasaufo.htm
http://www.freewebs.com/nurmufo/tether.html
http://www.greatdreams.com/ufos/propulsion.htm
First effort which failed to deploy was onboard STS 46, as TSS 1R.
Second effort of TTS2 involved the 20 km cable which burned out from
too much energy at merely 19 km, thus failed before they could
accomplish the intended research.

David Sereda has a couple of books plus extremely interesting videos
that you should check out.
http://ufonasa.terra-ent.com/
http://www.sedonacreativelife.com/pre0143.html
-
Brad Guth

.