Re: LSAM
- From: "tomcat" <jlavine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Apr 2006 16:07:44 -0700
Brad Guth wrote:
A search for * shuttle tether * or perhaps something * STS-75 tether *
or even go for * UV tether video * will each get you started. I
believe the original tether science team was Italian. Then shortly
thereafter we essentially broke our shuttle and having exterminated
another crew plus whatever payload, and nothing since has gotten
launched on behalf of the tether dipole research. There's actually a
lot more interesting science and of UFO information associated with the
STS-75 mission than what was tether related.
http://www.rense.com/nasaufo/nasaufo.htm
http://www.freewebs.com/nurmufo/tether.html
http://www.greatdreams.com/ufos/propulsion.htm
First effort which failed to deploy was onboard STS 46, as TSS 1R.
Second effort of TTS2 involved the 20 km cable which burned out from
too much energy at merely 19 km, thus failed before they could
accomplish the intended research.
David Sereda has a couple of books plus extremely interesting videos
that you should check out.
http://ufonasa.terra-ent.com/
http://www.sedonacreativelife.com/pre0143.html
-
Brad Guth
Thanks, Brad, for the info. I knew something had the USAF scared!
They better start building the 'F-22 on Steroids' as quickly as
possible. Maybe they need to add extra 'growth hormone' to the
'Steroids'!
I have been advocating a 'Giant Increase' to the USAF budget,
immediately. We shouldn't expect them to 'prepare' on a measly 100
billion dollars a year. It should be increased to at least 400 billion
dollars a year in 50 billion dollar increments over the next 6 years.
This absolutely must begin at once.
The USAF has the 'heart' for it, if Congress has the bucks. Congress
has to stop being 'faint' hearted about such things. They can't pull
their pants down on this one.
tomcat
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LSAM
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: LSAM
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Is USA going to be embarrased by China getting to Mars first
- Next by Date: Re: Falcon 1 Fire Caused by "Procedural Error"-New "Info"
- Previous by thread: Re: LSAM
- Next by thread: Re: LSAM
- Index(es):