Re: Electrogravitics is Reality!


Dogone_Tribe_from_Sirus_B wrote:
W. Mook is correct in his assertion that using the Lorentz force
without taking
into account the stress energy tensor is "ludicrous", yet I wouldn't
want to discredit
the intent of the post by discrediting the inventor's "working models"
as an "example"
of "fuelless" technology. It is truly a revolutionary concept that
causes us to think
about the energy dependency and international manipulation taking
place, whose
proponents wish to *dictate* energy policy to the *world*.


We are dealing here with the gap between the theoretical and
experimental methods. The 'theoretical' often has to catch up to the
'experimental'. Electrogravitic works. It has been proven to work.


International governments are *hot on the heels* of any type of this
technology
making it into the mainstream. Why? Because this type of technology
would replace
our *antiquated* highway civilizations with *flying cars* rather than
*gas guzzlers*.
My question is this: If the technology that steers the most modern form
of automobile
that we have on the planet cannot adapt to this revolutionary
technology, then what
good is a college education going to do for anybody? What good can any
society do
for anybody? Will the energy establishments always be interested only
in boxing out
manipulative technologies for *earth bound* colonies?


The "energy establishments" are looking at tabulated money figures,
profit and loss statements. They are interested in satisfying
stockholders, not the countries or populations of those countries.
Because of this they are sometimes the opponents of technology change.


Ah, but here is the catch: Technology should always be from the *top
down*, but what
is the *top down* if those entities *with the power* would never speak
to us until now?
Will the *bottom up* always be the *initiator* of *top down*
incrementalism? As I have
stated in an earlier post, "What Would NASA do with (298 million)(30
Pieces of Silver)?
because if Populism wins elections, so would the upwardly (and
outwardly) mobile
win employment in a quantum energized economy!"

A "quantum energized" economy should produce so much material wealth
that transitional change would amount to pennies compared to it's
benefits. Holding back on technology that works, for either
theoretical or economic reasons, doesn't make sense.


Tomcat told me to watch out for the "green glow", and I think he was
right on point with
his assertion, but also in addition to *black projects* that are
already using this
technology! Ever heard of area 51? Well, we're still waiting to escape
from our
dependency on foreign oil and domestic environmentalism! If no one can
help us, then,
by God, we'll do it ourselves!


The oil problem is dominated by the corporations that have an enormous
investment in distributing and selling oil products. The quantity of
energy needed to run our society, however, has gone beyond what a
diminishing supply of world oil can provide. This 'fact' is the
driving force behind rapidly increasing prices for gasoline, not simply
Middle East politics. It is time for change. Changing to He-3 and
hydrogen energy makes a lot of sense, as well as other alternative
energy sources.


"It's time to change Derbies for Stetsons and kick some mule ***!"


When it comes to energy, yes, it is time for change. And,
electrogravitics should be added to our aircraft immediately.


Yes, Mr. Mook, the stress energy tensor can tell us how to perform
"teleportation"
rather than subluminal "transportation", so now the question comes down
to "who wants
to go verses who wants to stay?" (We'll leave that to those
"earthlings" who have already
decided that we didn't evolve here, but were a *genetic experiment* of
sorts, and may
or may not wish to return to the other *star*. Yeah, its really a
spiritual battle between
the "forces of darkness" (stay underground during the next pole shift?)
and the forces of
light (let's get out of here, -an exercise in blood resonance that
dripped on the mercy
seat!).


It is difficult to explain why there are humanoids on Mars. See:
http://stardot.blogspot.com/


Can we "press on" until that day by changing our financial dependency
to indepence
by mining the asteroids? Ask on, because after 7 years on the internet
under the heading
"Asteroid Mining Technology" (at the top of the google search engine),
I have recieved no
more than about 5 really, truly interested people, all of which I have
never heard from
again (because, I think the issue here, really, is the affordability of
earth-to-orbit
nuclear pulse technology) as Mr. Mook has so eloquently ascertained in
his posts. Yet
no one really *important* in the energy industry has recognized that
there is a type of
*non-lethal* nuclear pulse technology that would shrink the EMP area to
under 50 miles!
It's suprising to me that *somebody like* Elon Musk isn't on top of
this technology!


Moons and asteroids are loaded with resources for a highly industrial
economy. He-3, at 3 billion dollars a ton, is the first resource
valuable enough to immediately justify the expense of rocketships.


Why not forget earth-to-orbit nuclear pulse propulsion technology and
just *teleport* off
the planet?, one might ask. Maybe because all that would be left are a
conglomorate of
international bankers with empty pockets, ready for Armageddon, or
perhaps the self-
absorbed adults who'd rather be *entertained* by the swill of junk on
the airwaves, or
maybe those whose *fire by night and smoke by day is someone else's
fall from grace
at the altar of legalism*. Whatever they might decide is completely
irrelevent to what
is being done, at least in spirit, and at most in *real technology*


We have the technology today to build a waverider capable of escape
velocity. The use of Thiokol SRBs as RATO (Rocket Assisted Take Off)
units and 'electrogravitic' to smooth airflow and increase thrust are a
couple of things that might make the transition to Outer Space a ten
year goal, not a century long ordeal.


tomcat

.