Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:20:49 -0500
"Douglas Holmes" <noholmesdgspam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
vZz4g.267$c%5.114@trnddc02:">news:vZz4g.267$c%5.114@trnddc02:
"Will McLean" <mclean1382@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1146246953.488628.58510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
An interesting report from Flight International
http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles/2006/04/25/Navigation/177/206161/
CEV+landing+system+re-evaluated+.html
Says they are going to a ten meter diameter CaLV so they can use
RS-68s.
Will McLean
Leave it to NASA
If there is an easy way and a hard way they choose the hard way.
All that just so they can have one launch instead of two.
Huh?
They *are* going to have two launches - one CLV and one CaLV.
--
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Douglas Holmes
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- References:
- 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Will McLean
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Douglas Holmes
- 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Prev by Date: Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Next by Date: Re: The moon, solar power and 'dark pollution'.
- Previous by thread: Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Next by thread: Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|