Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: "Douglas Holmes" <noholmesdgspam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:22:37 GMT
"Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns97B462BD1D987jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Douglas Holmes" <noholmesdgspam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote inIf NASA increases the number of launches they can use:
R6I4g.1466$nV4.394@trnddc04:">news:R6I4g.1466$nV4.394@trnddc04:
"Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns97B3D9276F751jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Douglas Holmes" <noholmesdgspam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote inNASA calls it 1.5 launches.
vZz4g.267$c%5.114@trnddc02:">news:vZz4g.267$c%5.114@trnddc02:
Leave it to NASA
If there is an easy way and a hard way they choose the hard way.
All that just so they can have one launch instead of two.
Huh?
They *are* going to have two launches - one CLV and one CaLV.
Regardless of the nomenclature, your objection still makes no sense.
4 segment solid rockets already in production.
The existing fuel tank.
RL-10 engines for the upper stage also aready in use.
If they stick with the current architecture they need:
NEW 5 segment solid rockets
NEW taller wider fuel tank
NEW upper stage engine.
The first rocket is much easier to design and build then the second.
NASA is choosing the second or the hard way.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: jonathan
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Thomas Lee Elifritz
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- References:
- 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Will McLean
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Douglas Holmes
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Douglas Holmes
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Prev by Date: Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Next by Date: Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Previous by thread: Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Next by thread: Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading