Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:03:36 -0500
"Douglas Holmes" <noholmesdgspam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:hpM4g.4908
$Un3.783@trnddc05:
"Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns97B462BD1D987jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Douglas Holmes" <noholmesdgspam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote inIf NASA increases the number of launches they can use:
R6I4g.1466$nV4.394@trnddc04:">news:R6I4g.1466$nV4.394@trnddc04:
"Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns97B3D9276F751jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Douglas Holmes" <noholmesdgspam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote inNASA calls it 1.5 launches.
vZz4g.267$c%5.114@trnddc02:">news:vZz4g.267$c%5.114@trnddc02:
Leave it to NASA
If there is an easy way and a hard way they choose the hard way.
All that just so they can have one launch instead of two.
Huh?
They *are* going to have two launches - one CLV and one CaLV.
Regardless of the nomenclature, your objection still makes no sense.
4 segment solid rockets already in production.
The existing fuel tank.
RL-10 engines for the upper stage also aready in use.
If they stick with the current architecture they need:
NEW 5 segment solid rockets
NEW taller wider fuel tank
NEW upper stage engine.
The first rocket is much easier to design and build then the second.
NASA is choosing the second or the hard way.
*Now* you are starting to make more sense. But your new points are
independent of your original point - that NASA was trying to have one
launch instead of two. They're not. Whether you choose to call it "1.5"
or "2". it's still two launches.
--
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
.
- References:
- 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Will McLean
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Douglas Holmes
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Douglas Holmes
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- From: Douglas Holmes
- 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Prev by Date: Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Next by Date: Re: The moon, solar power and 'dark pollution'.
- Previous by thread: Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Next by thread: Re: 10 meter diameter CaLV
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|