Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
- From: echomko_at_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric Chomko)
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 18:36:44 +0000 (UTC)
Rand Simberg (simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
: Hop David wrote:
: > Rand Simberg wrote:
: >
: >> Hop David wrote:
: >>
: >>> Rand argues his personal attacks are not ad hominem.
: >>
: >>
: >>
: >> Which is correct.
: >
: >
: > 90% of my post was on NEAs and delta vee. This was the part you chose to
: > snip. I have no interest in discussing what is and isn't ad hominem.
: And yet you did.
: >
: >>
: >>> Whatever you call it, it reduces the signal to noise ratio around here.
: >>
: >>
: >>
: >> No doubt, though nowhere near as much as almost anything that Eric
: >> Chomko (and others) post as a matter of course.
: >
: >
: > And who might these others be?
: >
: > (Scanning the ng...) Ah. "First Cosmonaut Yury Gagarin Proposed
: > Reconstruction Of The Church Of Christ The Saviour"
: Well, that was't necessarily the "others" to whom I was referring. I
: was leaving them unnamed to protect the guilty.
Too bad you're not as talented as you think you are. We might actually
HAVE commercial spaceflight by now. :)
Eric
.
- References:
- Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
- From: Hop David
- Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
- From: Hop David
- Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
- Prev by Date: Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
- Next by Date: Re: Interplanetary timekeeping
- Previous by thread: Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
- Next by thread: Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|