Re: SLAM! Scientists float plan to blast water to moon
- From: "Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2006 10:05:09 -0700
Len,
So what's the difference, whereas still there's no such hard-science
pertaining to whatever water or raw ice in space. There's not a
freaking clue as to how many seconds or perhaps microseconds a given m3
of raw ice or salty ice will last upon the moon, especially the extra
hot and extra reactive sunny side that's also so freaking gamma and
hard-X-ray leathal to our frail DNA.
I've previously suggested a cost effective and relatively low-tech
notion of impacting our moon with large blocks or spheres of dry-ice
containing Ra and LRn, or as merely containing salty ice. Thus far we
have established no such hard science as to raw ice coexisting in
space, much less after having impacted our physically dark and nasty
moon that so badly needs to get terraformed into something that only
robotics would appreciate.
-
Brad Guth
.
- References:
- SLAM! Scientists float plan to blast water to moon
- From: Space Cadet
- Re: SLAM! Scientists float plan to blast water to moon
- From: Len
- SLAM! Scientists float plan to blast water to moon
- Prev by Date: Re: SLAM! Scientists float plan to blast water to moon
- Next by Date: Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
- Previous by thread: Re: SLAM! Scientists float plan to blast water to moon
- Next by thread: Re: SLAM! Scientists float plan to blast water to moon
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|