Re: Bush & NASA
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:17:40 GMT
On 14 Jun 2006 15:50:08 -0700, in a place far, far away,
ianparker2@xxxxxxxxx made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:
I should also note that scientific theories can't be "proven." This
is because, by their nature, they're inductive, not deductive. They
can only be disproven. Evolution has not been proven (yet, and likely
never will). But you should learn a little about how science works,
if you want to pretend to defend it.
I think that you're more interested in bashing Bush, than in defending
science.
Evolution has been proved. There are in fact 2 ways to look at it.
1) Fossil record.
2) Fractal decomposition.
You apparently don't understand how science works.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: ianparker2
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: ianparker2
- Re: Bush & NASA
- References:
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: Hyper
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: Hyper
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: Hyper
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: Hyper
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Bush & NASA
- From: ianparker2
- Re: Bush & NASA
- Prev by Date: Re: Re : Lunar Solar Power Stations vs. The Glaser Proposal
- Next by Date: Re: Definition of a planet
- Previous by thread: Re: Bush & NASA
- Next by thread: Re: Bush & NASA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|