Re: Foam and rescue possibilities
- From: henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry Spencer)
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:10:29 GMT
In article <1151402939.812148.237790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Alex Terrell <alexterrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
With an inline SDHLV, the impact issue largely goes away. However, it
does seem they're now going for a complete redesign. In which case it
might make sense to jettison most of the insulation. Won't happen
though.
Probably not. The S-II's external LH2-tank insulation was originally
separate panels; they were retained rather than jettisoned, but it
wouldn't have been a big stretch to jettison them. However, they too
turned out to need helium purges and other hassles, and it was a big
improvement when they were abandoned in favor of -- you guessed it --
spray-on foam. NASA isn't likely to want to open that can of worms
again without an urgent reason.
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Foam and rescue possibilities
- From: Alex Terrell
- Re: Foam and rescue possibilities
- References:
- Foam and rescue possibilities
- From: Allen Thomson
- Re: Foam and rescue possibilities
- From: Alex Terrell
- Re: Foam and rescue possibilities
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Foam and rescue possibilities
- From: Alex Terrell
- Foam and rescue possibilities
- Prev by Date: Re: Mars Society to Launch 4-Month Mars Mission to the High Arctic
- Next by Date: Re: Keith Cowing on microgravity research
- Previous by thread: Re: Foam and rescue possibilities
- Next by thread: Re: Foam and rescue possibilities
- Index(es):