Re: FAA Blue Origin environmental assessment
- From: Joe Strout <joe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:36:57 -0600
In article <d81eb$44a027ce$927a2cf9$23259@xxxxxxxx>,
"Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Engines and propellants are
quite diverse, too, including hybrids, which I think have never been
used on a manned craft before.
I believe SS1 was hybrid.
Hah! True. I was thinking of vertical launchers, but of course that's
not what I said, so you are quite right.
One can only hope that one or more of these ventures is successful and
manages to turn a profit.
Indeed. But I'm more optimistic about this than I have been in decades
past, precisely *because* there are so many of them, trying such a
variety of approaches, all aiming to make a profit, and many of them
backed by pockets deep enough to give it a fair chance.
Best,
- Joe
.
- References:
- FAA Blue Origin environmental assessment
- From: Allen Thomson
- Re: FAA Blue Origin environmental assessment
- From: Joe Strout
- Re: FAA Blue Origin environmental assessment
- From: Jeff Findley
- FAA Blue Origin environmental assessment
- Prev by Date: Re: top ten reasons there'll be faster progress
- Next by Date: Re: top ten reasons there'll be faster progress
- Previous by thread: Re: FAA Blue Origin environmental assessment
- Next by thread: Re: FAA Blue Origin environmental assessment
- Index(es):