Re: Pinkerton On Hawking
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:25:59 GMT
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:12:37 GMT, in a place far, far away,
seewebsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (John Savard) made the phosphor
on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
Of course, it is *expected* that private space is an investment
involving risks as well as rewards, and so if one of the current space
ventures survives and prospers, while the others fall by the wayside,
that would still be success.
I, personally, am not inspired with optimism that this can happen:
they're all focussed on radically new markets, which require a much
lower cost to go to space than we now have.
This is the only way that we're going to get reduced costs. Existing
market don't care that much, and it's not in the interest of existing
providers to reduce costs.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pinkerton On Hawking
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Pinkerton On Hawking
- References:
- Re: Pinkerton On Hawking
- From: John Savard
- Re: Pinkerton On Hawking
- Prev by Date: Re: top ten reasons there'll be faster progress
- Next by Date: Re: top ten reasons there'll be faster progress
- Previous by thread: Re: Pinkerton On Hawking
- Next by thread: Re: Pinkerton On Hawking
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|