Re: Worth The Mission?
- From: Jim Kingdon <kingdon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 09:34:24 -0400
Agreed, it all hinges on the value of the mission. If you think
assembling ISS and servicing HST is worth it, then fly - and fly now; no
amount of tinkering with the foam will make the overall mission risk much
lower than it is already. Otherwise, don't fly, period.
Good summary.
Rand's contention, that the hand-wringing over whether to launch is a
symptom of a program of marginal utility (or perceived utility) is an
interesting one. A possibly related idea is that a grounded shuttle
is the best way to achieve "slow progress towards an ill-defined goal"
(Henry Spencer's phrase for the best way to keep a standing army fed).
As for servicing HST, I'm still curious how that is going to shake
out. That crew won't have the option of sheltering at ISS (I don't
know whether there are plans being worked to make a rescue by a second
shuttle - or even perhaps Soyuz - feasible. It is harder than the ISS
case because the wounded shuttle has to provide life support
unassisted long enough for rescue craft to arrive).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Worth The Mission?
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: Worth The Mission?
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: Worth The Mission?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Worth The Mission?
- References:
- Re: Worth The Mission?
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: Worth The Mission?
- Prev by Date: Re: How to Cool a Planet (far fetched ideas)
- Next by Date: Re: Worth The Mission?
- Previous by thread: Re: Worth The Mission?
- Next by thread: Re: Worth The Mission?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|