Re: mass is light.
- From: "American" <samuelransom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jul 2006 08:34:33 -0700
Jim Davis wrote:
tomcat wrote:
You know, a moment of speculation would tell you that the United
States may have landed on the Moon in flying saucers. The film
of the LM was probably faked to cover it up. There is always
the 'possibility' that the movie Forbidden Planet' may have been
the true level of American technology in the late 50's.
Just when you think there is a limit to the imbecility to which
posters can descend...
Believe
you me, those black projects the USAF has are really something
else!
<chuckle>
A spiritualist who claims to be channeling Alexander Abian is more
believable than you!
Jim Davis
The black gets blacker. Ever heard of the two-stage-to-orbit Blackstar
Program? Probably not. In fact, it seems one only finds out about this
thing AFTER THE FACT. In fact, I wouldn't doubt for a moment that
there is a USSC (United States Space Command):
"As I understand it, THE US SPACE COMMAND is under MOSTLY
Navy authority, with their central base underneath KING'S PEAK,
UTAH about 100m outside of KING'S PEAK, Salt Lake in a national
forest. They command a fleet of craft that run missions from advanced
bases on the Moon, Mars and moons near Jupiter. Apparently we are
also being lied to about the ability of planets in our solar system to
sustain life. My personal experience of this was speaking to a scien-
tist who claimed he was at the JANET facility(Area 51) in NV in the
early 1970s and that he worked on a large jet-style space craft with
"Extra Solar Capabilities", with skin on it "that was rubbery,
like a
dolphin." My own experience was back in '92, SEEING with my own
eyes, a huge shuttlelike craft, about 1600 ft. long, surrounded by a
helicopter escort, LAND out at A-51. It was shovel nosed, white on
top, black on the bottom, wide in the middle and scooped up at the
back like a Corvette with three afterburners.
This was the same time that something was creating SKYQUAKES
that were being reported in the news, and they even reported that it
was coming in at MACH 25 from space, OVER MY HOUSE IN SO
CAL, then landing at A-51. YEARS later I saw a DISCOVERY
special that had a graphic of a similar craft they called the X-60,
that would be flying in 2025."
Associates Newsletter, Volume IX, December 12, 2005 Issue #112From Confidential Sources, available over the Internet as Delphi
Forget all you knew about what you thought our current military
capability was. This makes the War in Iraq seem like a carnival
to what we're preparing ourselves for. This is one major reason
why I think the war in Iraq gets too much irrational publicity from
leftist media types - they've been living in a whole separate uni-
verse for over 60 years, without accepting a more broadly-based,
bolder initiative that the "rigid right" has proposed. The Femini-
zation of America threatens our own culture first, by exporting the
ill-willed modernization of mass-media types, while ignoring the
value of "content" in the advance that should be leading
the technology.
The "ruse" is that we're exporting luke-warm technology interna-
tionally, and what's left of true believers in the world recognize
the ruse, and will FIGHT THIS FUTURE, to an extent, depending upon
how much they are being "dumbed down". I have no doubts what-
soever, that there are human rights waivers being made in the name
of mass profits, but in most instances, the societies performing
these atrocities are locally based, rather than being "ill-willed" from
abroad. The problem for America, is that most Americans accept
"dumbing down" as an excuse for more leisure activities, such as
television, video games, and portability, i.e., "internationalism",
rather than trying to understand the value of the territory in which
they live. This leaves boundaries defaulting to culturalism, rather
than true modernization, both nationally and internationally.
George Bush cannot be viewed in the perspective of being an
international hero, if he is constantly dogged by liberal media
types. Their perspectives are all out of whack - they license them-
selves with national socialism, because they believe "That is what
Bush is doing to us" rather than actually seeing through the veiled
stigmatism of a real cowboy type riding the wave of progress through-
the free world. This "worn-out" analogy tires the self-indulgent. The
analogy also begs for redefinition amidst a clamoring public, so why
don't the public-at-large see the veil?
- Because they are too caught up in nationalism.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- (Continued)
- From: American
- (Continued)
- Prev by Date: NASA's Goals Delete Mention of Home Planet
- Next by Date: Re: SpaceShipTwo "on time and on budget"
- Previous by thread: NASA's Goals Delete Mention of Home Planet
- Next by thread: (Continued)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
