Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: "Brad Guth" <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:43:20 +0000 (UTC)
"Len" <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1155244503.490168.273020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As far as I am concerned, you have lost any semblence of credibility
you might still have with your shoot-from-the-hip, incredibly poor
knowledge of this particular matter.
Len,
In other words, you can't or will not dare to answer my questions. Gee
whiz, folks, why am I not the least bit surprised.
I'm still asking those perfectly honest questions about our
magnetosphere and our moon, that which you folks claim as all-knowing
about, yet you folks can't so much as to bother sharing upon anything of
replicated hard-science specifics that obviously could potentially taint
any one of your pagan gods.
-
Just in case you folks failed to get my previous drift:
How absolutely pathetic, in that I'm sharing the best available truth
and nothing but the truth about our moon and of the other intelligent
life as having been existing/coexisting on Venus, and instead you folks
are still into worshiping pagan gods. The likes James Van Allen is only
in the news because that sorry SOB has finally gone and died on us, and
without ever having shared the truth (wouldn't dare because his entire
extended family and of his close circle of friends and of everything
he'd ever been associated with would become absolutely devastated if the
truth be told).
I'm terribly sorry folks, but that life of such supposed all-knowing
expertise and otherwise good fortune as to having supposedly tagged our
magnetosphere and of the horrific radiation within, was of no great loss
to modern science nor humanity, whereas James Van Allen was yet another
entirely bought and paid for soul, as well as being a typical born-again
minion/puppet that continually acted on behalf of the mostly white
Jewish propaganda status quo as orchestrated by their rather exceptional
hold on most everything media and textbook related, as having been
entirely orchestrated (AKA made for TV) infomercial that required the
name of a real person in order to accommodate whatever the mainstream
status quo agenda and of their ruse of the century had established
within their mindset to accomplish, which obviously included his willing
part in the ongoing efforts of sustaining our mutually perpetrated
cold-war(s) until hell freezes over or any of them NASA/Apollo cows come
home. Thereby another portion of the truth has once again gone into yet
another grave, just the way MI/NSA~NASA likes it.
It seems that our naked and physically dark moon is simply unavoidably
at least ten fold if not 100+ fold worse off than any GSO environment
that's essentially smack in some of the worse TBI Van Allen badlands
that our magnetosphere has to offer. James Van Allen was never of any
help, nor can the physics or hard-science be extracted from anything
associated with his name.
Just try as you may at getting those specific Van Allen belt density or
attenuation numbers, especially as to most any given spectrum of lethal
solar/cosmic radiation that's getting through those Van Allen belts.
Good luck.
For something that's supposedly so terrestrial life essential, as in
representing itself as to having sustained Earth's protective atmosphere
and otherwise further shielding us from some of the worse kinds of DNA
trauma, we actually know next to nothing about our badly failing
magnetosphere and of those Van Allen belts within. Why is that?
According to every available solar system simulator (of which our NASA
and of those continually sucking up to their infomercial ***, whereas
their having the very best of such simulators to work with), missions
A-11, A-14 and A-16 each had unobstructed views of Venus as being above
that physically dark lunar horizon, and otherwise having Venus at least
once been situated as though right next to and/or just below mother
Earth, whereas even though appearing as the much smaller item than
Earth, Venus was in fact unavoidably a brighter than Earth item that
would have been rather easily recorded as within an official EVA Kodak
moment, especially of any unfiltered Kodak moments as recorded upon the
likes of their Ektachrome film that was if anything rather sensitive to
the bluish, violet, near-UV and even a touch of having recorded into
UV-a, as photographing spectrums of light which the 0.75~0.80 reflective
albedo of Venus more than represented. Therefore, if anything that's
true and of fully replicated science about the photographic process and
of following the regular laws of physics, it is that Venus would have
photographed as even brighter yet than merely viewed by the human eye.
Yet never once from that physically dark lunar surface or as from orbit
had there ever been any sign of Venus, or for that matter of anything
other than a portion of Earth. Therefore our NASA/Apollo wizards are in
fact born-again liars, as in big time liars and so much worse. Van
Allen was merely a team player of our perpetrated cold-war(s), and
that's about all he ever was.
Now the grand ruse collective is doing all that it can in order to avoid
honest topics of our moon, Sirius or especially that of their having to
avoid Venus, in so much as apparently hoping if not having accommodated
such hope along with further insuring that the PFS instrument of the ESA
Venus EXPRESS mission never gets an opportunity to function. Our NASA
and of those associated has essentially caused irreprehensible harm to
science and therefore having caused great harm to Americans integrity as
well as having negatively impacted most all of humanity, and they
knowingly did such from their very beginnings, and their actions are
still very much into the their original game plan of snookering humanity
and that of summarily trashing our environment for all it's worth.
Usenet folks more often than not make me sick of being an American.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
- References:
- Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: Rusty
- Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: Len
- Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- Prev by Date: Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- Next by Date: The Dangerous Liberty of Engineering vs. Lukewarm Dominionism
- Previous by thread: Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- Next by thread: Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- Index(es):