The Dangerous Liberty of Engineering vs. Lukewarm Dominionism

Can anyone explain why we have a whopping $391 Billion
Defense Appropriations Bill awaiting signing and not
one penny for any kind of Advanced Propulsion Techno-
logy R&D for lowering the incredible gas prices? Enemy
"watchers" are those who practice the political "dumbing
down" of all PACS who might inadvertantly operate under
the umbrella of Transnational Dominionist manipulation.
With an advanced technocracy comes responsible divest-
iture - first, to the ones who need advanced propulsion
the most, and second, to those who can still afford the
current gas prices - but that is not why the "watchers"
are there. The "watchers" are there because they never
learned about advancing the cause of freedom. They
waited for people who were just like themselves to be-
come ideologues of extinct technology, never taking
the initiative to ask questions and demand answers.
Newer technology causes us to focus on the innovators
as well as the innovation, and to discard that which
doesn't measure up to the increased potential.
Therefore, the watchers are "left behind" rather than
"taken up".

The U.S. has totally ignored a policy that would have
enabled *technocracy* to neutralize Dominionist (i.e.,
"watcher") global ambition while simultaneously reduc-
ing the defense budget and the tax load on American
citizens. Since technology is a political tool in to-
day's world, it also becomes a weapon that must be used
to destroy, correspondingly, those who would compromise
a higher reality of greater innovation and technology,
because technology is the dynamic lifeblood of modern
economic development. The Inside-the-Beltway Oil PACS
represent a distortion on the common sense reasoning
that if a problem exists with the rising cost of a bar-
rel of oil, then the oil technology has already been
given over to Dominionist (i.e., "watcher") causes, and
a newer technology, that is in line already, will re-
place the *traitor technology* with a much more efficient
and cost-effective one.

If the Inside-the-Beltway Oil-PAC statists have become
mutually exclusive in protecting their unmodernizable
transnationalistic Dominionist status-quo energy estab-
lishment, then Democracy has failed to represent the
growing consensus that "oil is running America dry" of
true replacement technology, in the form of Electrograv-
itic Crystalographic Propulsion Technology. The enemy
within the beltway have much more reigning influence than
popular news outlets will ever admit, yet *TREASON* is de-
fined in the Constitution as "aid and comfort" to this
inside-the-beltway enemy of private industrial energy re-
vitalization. Since the intention to "aid and comfort" is
a vital element of TREASON, then it might be suggested
that our current PAC representatives are suffering from
a severe case of idiocy, inefficiency, and intellectual
myopia, if they continue to turn a blind eye towards
CHEAP, EFFICIENT, and VIABLE alternatives to gasoline.
Recently suggested alternatives may replace, but will
never be able to reverse the spiraling trend of fuel
costs. This is an attack on our freedoms as Americans,
and an insult to American ingenuity and financial
independence!

A cruel sociology could explain the disenchanting appeal
of Neo-Conservatism. The rise of the internet's New
Technocracy has alienated those who are unable to keep up
with the change, yet while this change was happening, a
creeping superficiality of mass media proclaiming contin-
ual crisis and situational ethics *encouraging* insecurity
and cynicism of religious, educational, and institutional-
ized democracy has gained Populist momentum, obfuscating
the Intellectual Knowledge Class of the Left - not to be
confused with the Constitutionalist "Intellectual Applica-
tions Class" of revolutionizing technology.

Newsmongers are nothing but oppositionists. They cannot
stand to be loyal followers of their own cause. They are
all windbags with no substance; they jump ship the minute
it gets to port. There must be an innate discomfort with
being on the winning side. Many newsmongers are born resist-
ors, haters of authority, and are apt to rebel against
anyone in power. There must be a perverse satisfaction in
malframing the good intentions of honest patriots for them
to believe that they have somehow shaped history. They are
the friends of mob rule, and enemies of innovation.
Licentiousness describes their species of liberty.

Alexander Hamilton thought that man's nature was evil, and
that he needed strong government to control his passions.
Thomas Jefferson, a tactful man, saw man as essentially
good, and needed his freedom protected from Monarchy. There
is essentially no difference today, with the exception that,
government has become too strong, and the dynasties of the
dominionists have nearly turned our country into a society
of antiquated automatons, complete with their programming
instructions from inside-the-beltway, Washington, D.C.

It will surely take some reinventing and technological con-
vincing in order to break the shackles of the energy death-
grip over the economy, but the best way to do that is to pre-
sent the facts of the matter. The facts consist of the afore-
mentioned theories, and there is plenty of scientific and
engineering technology available already to support those
theories; the only questions that remain are how to implement
those constructions with our current automotive and energy
industries, without running into the brick wall of dominion-
ist establishment. It would have to require a new
Constitutional Convention, without the choice of location
being a subversive one to its surroundings.

George Mason wrote the Virginia Declaration of Rights, which
became the basis for the Declaration of Independence. George
Mason later led the fight against ratifying the Constitution
because it failed to contain a Bill of Rights. It was men-
tioned a couple of posts ago, "Dominionism is a form of Social
Darwinism. It monopolizes wealth-power as a sign of God's
election, and berates poverty as a reflection of God's dis-
approval". We can now see what is happening when we include
George Mason's proposal for the FIRST AMENDMENT:

"All men have an equal, natural, and unalienable right to the
free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of con-
science; and that no particular sect or society of Christians
ought to be favored or established by law in preference to
others" (Kate Mason Roland, The Life of George Mason (N.Y.,
G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1892), Vol. I, p. 244)

Clearly we have here a violation of a majority of the civil
rights of taxpayers, when the oil PAC monopolies, directed by
Arab interests, become overwhelmed by Dominionists, rather
than *overhauled* by Constitutionalists!

.