Re: The Dangerous Liberty of Engineering vs. Lukewarm Dominionism
- From: "American" <samuelransom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Aug 2006 14:19:45 -0700
This is ONLY the GASOHOLIC'S ALTERNATE REALITY:
SVALSIK has just announced completion of its "Geodyne assimilator"
for recon missions to the asteroids. The "assimilator" allows "NHC"
tuning for resource exportation at the rate of 1000 grams per
second. The Nano-Host System features dimensional filtering up
to the 11th chirality using 1 over pi nano-emitter substrate in
the portal circumference. Controls feature a calibrated spectral
resolution slider for smooth incoming and outgoing transmissions.
Crystal integrity up to 1.2 parts per million phase resolution for
cargo transport.
AND NOW, REWIND TO 1982:
BRADY:
Mr. Chairman, it is a privilege for me to be here again. I have
testified before this subcommitie previously. As a matter of fact,
it is three years ago this month that I testified over on the
house side before the House Armed Services Committee in which I
disagreed with the political appointees of the Carter Administra-
tion and indicated that the technology which we were licensing
to the Soviet Union, specifically for the Kama River plant, was
being diverted to the Soviet military. It is 10 years ago this
month that the president of the United States inaugurated the era
of detente with a trip to Moscow.
A central component of that historic trip was the hope that great-
ly expanded trade ties between the East and the West would lead to
mutual cooperation and understanding.
Obviously, those hopes have not taken place. In that 10-year per-
iod, as we in the administration have indicated in the last year,
we have been exploited both legally and illegally by the Soviet
Union and Eastern Europe. This technology which has helped the
Soviet immensly in their military industrial infrastructure.
Again, 3 years ago, I personally disclosed the failures of the
Commerce Department in the licensing process, referring to it,
as I said in my testimony, as a shambles.
[Brady was criticized and his information suppressed for speaking
out]
CHAIRMAN ROTH:
Thank you, Mr. Brady. Mr. Brady, the members of the subcommittee
are, of course, aware of your personal commitment to this impor-
tant area, but I believe that it is important that the record re-
flect fully your position on the specific question of export tech-
nology and particularly reference the efforts some years ago to
help the Soviet Union construct some trucking facilities.
Would you, for the purposes of the record, explain your role in
this matter?
BRADY:
Mr. Chairman, about 3 years ago, the Export Administration Act
was up for review, the House Armed Services Committee decided
that it was going to hold hearings on that extension, in addition to
the committee of appropriate jurisdiction, namely the Foreign
Affairs Committee on the House side.
There were some statements being made on both sides in Congress
that were not totally consistent with the facts. We had intelli-
gence information that trucks were being produced at the Kama
River plant for the Soviet military and, in fact, being dis-
tributed to Eastern Europe for use in Eastern Europe endeavors.
An administration witness was asked about that and denied it.
I was asked about it and confirmed it. And, as a result of that,
I was labled a whistleblower and eventually left the Department
of Commerce. In point of fact, that was the tip of the iceberg.
There had been apparently intelligence through the 1970s, partic-
ularly the latter half of the seventies, indicating that there
was substantial diversion taking place (and) ...for some reason
the intelligence just didn't get to the top. So that was my role.
I eventually had to leave government for it.
***
Director of the Hoover Institution, W. Glenn Campbell, had also
claimed that the book: National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet
Union was a "plagarism of the author's works" that was published
by the Hoover Institution, and removed the title "Research Fellow"
from the author, Antony C. Sutton, and removed both his name and
that of his secretary from the personnel roll of the Hoover
Institution.
Glenn Campbell became chairman of Ronald Reagan's Intelligence
Oversight Committee.
Clearly, there is a conflict of interest between the Dominion-
ists in government and economic independence in the U.S., yet
the representatives on both sides of Capitol Hill would rather
represent the transnationalist continuum of Federal Reserve sup-
ply, since bureaucratic sponsorship became the latest transna-
tional approval tool of favoritism, rather than having indepen-
dent engineering entrepreneurs find seed investors to stop the
tide of international dominionism. The tares have thus become a
prerequisite for the wheat getting into the international market-
place.
"Men and governments, no doubt, are selfish, and prone to abuse
power when they have it; but no government can stand that rests
only on the selfishness of the human heart, or on what in the
last century they called "enlightened self interest," L'interet
bien entendu, and not on the sense of duty, strengthened by loy-
al affection. People must feel not only that it is their self in-
terest to sustain government, but that it is their moral and
religious duty to sustain it; and when they have no moral sense,
no religion, and no loyal affection, they should know that they
cannot sustain it, and society must cease to exist. A nation of
atheists were a solecism in history. A few atheists may perhaps,
live in society, and even serve it for a time, where the mass
of the people are believers and worshippers, but an entire na-
tion of atheists was never yet founded, and never could subsist
any longer than it would take to dissipate the moral wealth ac-
quired while it was yet a religious nation. It is well said by
the Abbe de La Mennais, before his unhappy fall: "Religion
is always found by the cradle of nations, philosphy only at
their tombs" - meaning, as he did, philosphy in the sense of
the rational exercise of the faculties of the human mind on
divine and human things, aided by the light of revelation. The
ancient lawgivers always sought for their laws not only a moral,
but a religious sanction, and where the voice of God does not,
in some form, speak to men's consciences, and bid them obey the
higher power, government can subsist only as a craft or as
sheer force, which nobody is bound to respect or obey."
- Liberalism and Progress, Orestes Brownson, Brownson's Quarterly
Review for October, 1864
One would be apt to disqualify the "invasion" of Iraq or the
"invasion" of Lebanon as an attack on religious freedom if more
attention were paid to the moral responsibility that the "Good
Samaritan" teaches, yet the focus was purely upon contemporary
liberal ideolography, and where the 60 year veil of bureaucratic
grace-to-humanist-belief paved the way for Dominionist govern-
ment to enslave those just escaping the tyranny of transnational-
ist partnership, in the form of exporting trade secrets and the
waiver of unblessed assurance, in order that the re-negotiated God
of humanism would make *God's natural laws* the uncompromised sci-
entific dogma of Dominionists. The lie is that most voters still
believe that humanism should exist as a religion alongside moral
relativism, and that Dominionism is 'just another religion' along-
side Christianity.
The business of lending blood money is one of the most thoroughly
sordid, cold blooded, and criminal that was ever carried on, to
any considerable extent, amongst human beings. It is like lending
money to slave traders, or to common robbers and pirates, to be
repaid out of their plunder. And the man who loans money to govern-
ments, so called for the purpose of enabling the latter to rob,
enslave, and murder their people, are amongst the greatest vil-
lians the world has ever seen.
- Lysander Spooner, No Treason (Boston, 1870)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Launch Failure Review for 2006
- Next by Date: Re: Launch Failure Review for 2006
- Previous by thread: Re: The Dangerous Liberty of Engineering vs. Lukewarm Dominionism
- Next by thread: Re: The Dangerous Liberty of Engineering vs. Lukewarm Dominionism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
