Re: International Space Station
- From: "BlagooBlanaa" <BlagooBlanaa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:52:05 +1000
Or break it up and use it for shuttles/command
modules to get back to the moon or on to mars
energetics and orbital mechanics may be tricky though
which only goes to re-emphasise my original points.
What is needed is the vision to see that every launch should be
a part of an integrated philosophy for realising the exploitation
of space.
THE major failing is treating each launch as a seperate mission,
hermetically sealed from all other missions for convenience and
budget. This treats the materiel from each mission like
ammunition - to be discarded after one shot.
In part this is due to how money is procured and how Nasa has
been treat like a budgetary flywheel to keep the economy ticking
over.
As such the disjointed mission oriented focus for sopping up dollars
and providing high tech jobs for the masses has basically wasted a
40 year advantage in space.
bah
get on with it NASA or get out of the way and let someone
else use the money like it should be used
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: International Space Station
- From: Frank Glover
- Re: International Space Station
- From: Monte Davis
- Re: International Space Station
- References:
- International Space Station
- From: vze3gz45
- Re: International Space Station
- From: BlagooBlanaa
- International Space Station
- Prev by Date: Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- Next by Date: Re: International Space Station
- Previous by thread: Re: International Space Station
- Next by thread: Re: International Space Station
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|